The Supreme Court rejected a petition contesting three criminal laws, criticizing its casual filing. The laws, yet to be enforced, aim to replace existing criminal statutes. Passed without full parliamentary debate, the laws face scrutiny for their perceived draconian nature, extending police custody and redefining sedition. The petitioner sought an expert committee to assess their validity. The laws, effective from July 1, introduce new terms like “Deshdroh” (treason) and define terrorism for the first time. Critics argue they threaten fundamental rights and empower law enforcement excessively.